Thanks Patrick.
As WCF says: “This covenant of grace is frequently set forth in Scripture by the name of a testament…”
“This covenant was differently administered in the time of the law, and in the time of the gospel…”
“…it is held forth in more fullness, evidence and spiritual efficacy, to all nations, both Jews and Gentiles; and is called the new testament. There are not therefore two covenants of grace, differing in substance, but one and the same, under various dispensations.”
~ The roots of dispensationalism! ~
Comments are welcomed and encouraged. However, I reserve the right to edit or delete comments which do not follow these guidelines:
1. Please stay on topic.
2. Please be concise.
3. Please offer logical argumentation for your assertions.
4. Please refrain from abusive comments directed toward fellow readers.
Link Disclaimer
I will often provide links to websites, articles, or sermons I find helpful. This is not intended to be interpreted as a full endorsement of a particular website, organization, work, or author. As always, a Berean attitude is strongly encouraged (Acts 17:10-11).
Hugh
January 31, 2013 at 9:00 PM
Thanks Patrick.
As WCF says: “This covenant of grace is frequently set forth in Scripture by the name of a testament…”
“This covenant was differently administered in the time of the law, and in the time of the gospel…”
“…it is held forth in more fullness, evidence and spiritual efficacy, to all nations, both Jews and Gentiles; and is called the new testament. There are not therefore two covenants of grace, differing in substance, but one and the same, under various dispensations.”
~ The roots of dispensationalism! ~
Patrick T. McWilliams
February 1, 2013 at 11:28 AM
I don’t know if I’d call it the “roots,” and I suppose it would depend on which brand of dispensationalism, but there are some interesting parallels.